Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review processAbbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Home Bill Clinton’s Health Raises Questions After This Sighting

Bill Clinton Spotted With Defibrillator Amid Ongoing Health Concerns Former President Bill Clinton, 79, was photographed in the Hamptons this week carrying what appeared to be a…

You searched for WATCH: Trump Expands Federal Takeover To Another BIue City

Speaking from the Oval Office, President Donald Trump announced that his administration will broaden its federal crime initiative beyond Washington, D.C., targeting additional cities that he says…

Trump Ally Preparing Senate Run Against Murkowski: Report

The move would place him against Murkowski, who has repeatedly clashed with President Donald Trump and is often viewed as one of the most moderate Republicans in…

Republicans Propose Splitting California Into Two States Amid Redistricting Push

Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher (R-Yuba City) introduced the plan Wednesday at a news conference in Sacramento, unveiling a map for what he called “The Two State…

Shocking Secrets Revealed: Epstein Victim Virginia Giuffre Names Names in Explosive Tell-All Hitting Shelves Oct. 21

Prince Andrew’s s3x accuser is set t0 release an ‘unsparing’ mem0ir fr0m bey0nd the grave. The ‘intimate’ t0me by Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre will be published…

“She’s Out: Bondi Fires DOJ Figure After Explosive Act Caught on Camera”

In the corridors of federal power, where bureaucratic norms have governed behavior for decades, a new sheriff is making it clear that business as usual is no…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *