Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Majority of House Dems Vote No on Foreign Influence Proposal for Schools!

Once again, a majority of House Democrats have put other nations above the United States, as evidenced by their opposition to a measure aimed at limiting the…

Senator Says Judge’s Block On Defunding Planned Parenthood ‘Impeachable’!

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, is suggesting that impeachment proceedings may be warranted against U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani after she blocked enforcement of a provision in the…

Melania Trump Unveils Warm, Festive Christmas Décor at the White House!

First Lady Melania Trump chose the White House’s Christmas decorations and theme, “Home is Where the Heart Is,” to commemorate the holiday season. This is the fifth…

No President Ever Tried This. Trump Just Did — On Live Camera!

In a moment that’s now sending shockwaves through press freedom advocates, Donald Trump appeared before reporters this week and made a chilling declaration: “Changes are coming.” He…

The House passed a bill seeking to ban gender transition–related medical treatments for minors, marking a significant step in an ongoing national debate. Supporters argue the measure protects children from irreversible decisions, while critics say it interferes with medical judgment and family choice. The bill now moves forward amid legal, political, and public scrutiny.

The vote stunned even seasoned lawmakers. In a razor-thin margin, the House moved to turn doctors into felons and families into suspects. One side called it “saving…

Trump Labels Opponent an ‘Obama Loyalist,’ Urges Senate Republicans to End Filibuster!

President Donald Trump is still pushing for the Senate GOP to get rid of the filibuster. The president posted a video on Truth Social on Monday that…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *