Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Ron Ely, best known for his role as Tarzan, experienced heartbreaking circumstances in his later years following the death of his wife Valerie

Actor Ron Ely, best known for his iconic portrayal of Tarzan in the 1960s television series, died at the age of 86 after spending many years away…

Body Language Clues That Reveal How Someone Is Feeling

Throughout human history, the human body has served as a silent canvas, communicating messages that words cannot always capture. From the way someone holds their shoulders to…

Why Slugs Are More Important Than You Might Think

For many people, encountering a slug evokes little more than a grimace. Slimy, slow-moving, and often seen gliding across damp sidewalks or hiding under leaves in the…

Eddie Murphy’s Son to Welcome First Child with Fellow Comedian’s Daughter

On February 2, 2026, the internet lit up with heartwarming news: Eric Murphy and Jasmin Lawrence are expecting their first child together. The announcement came through a…

The Simple Act That Brightened a Little Girl’s Day

Many children carry a quiet longing for something that captivates their imagination, a desire born not from a lack of ambition, but from circumstance. It is a…

Finding a Penny in Your Car Door? Here’s What It Could Signify

Your car is more than just a vehicle—it’s your personal space, a sanctuary, and often your primary mode of transportation. Most of us assume that once we…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *